Archive of 2005 Material
Articles | Editorials | Letters to the Editor
The Recorder is a weekly newspaper published in Monterey, VA.
P. Lea Campbell Jr., Publisher and Editor
Anne E. Adams, General Manager
P O Box 10, Monterey, VA 24465
540-468-2147
e-mail: recorder@htcnet.org
The Recorder launched an on-line service in April 2005.
Please visit TheRecorderOnline for all non-wind local news.
We will link directly to this site for any wind articles posted there.
The Recorder has provided continuing in-depth coverage of the wind-power issue in Highland County as it has developed for several years. Listed below are all items that were published in 2005. They are in reverse chronological order so the latest info is always at the top. This is a complete list. We will add links if we can get digital versions of more items.
Most documents on this web site are posted in Adobe Portable Document Format [PDF]. In order to access these you must have Adobe Acrobat or Acrobat Reader installed on your computer. The Reader is free and can be downloaded by clicking the above link. You must then choose the correct version for your computer. If you have a dial-up connection you probably want the Basic version. Even that is 8.7 MB for Windows and 15 MB for Mac, so it will take some time to download. If you have Acrobat integrated with your browser you can click the link to any PDF file and view it in the browser window. To download the file to your computer, right click the link and select Save Target As.
Articles:
- Articles published on or after 3 January 2008
- Articles published in 2007
- Articles published in 2006
- SCC Hearings set in Highland 30 December 2005, on-line only, no print edition this week.
- Wind Watch: Summary of regional and national news on wind energy development 23 December 2005, p. 5
- Wind energy suit will go to trial 16 December 2005, p. 1, 3 Report on the court hearing in Monterey on 12 December.
- Plaintiffs trump countys bid to dismiss suit Trial date set: June 14 in Highland courthouse 16 December 2005, p. 4-6 More details on the court hearing. The trial has been rescheduled for 27 June.
- Sidebar: Whats it cost? The legal expenses 16 December 2005, p. 4 Highland supervisors have spent over $30K to date defending their actions.
- U.S. Wind files application for Jack Mountain project 16 December 2005, p. 5 Liberty Gap proposal is resubmitted to the WV PSC.
- Wind energy committee gathers on Wednesday 9 December 2005, p. 2 Agenda for National Research Council meeting in Charleston.
- Highland requests wind energy bill to increase local revenue 9 December 2005, p. 1-2 BOS requests a bill to guarantee $5K per year per MW.
- Green energy has a place in Virginia, says Va. Tech study 25 November 2005, p.3, 6. [The complete report, 107 pp., 1.22 MB]
- Friends of Pendleton gear up for battle U.S. Wind Force still lacks t-line leases 25 November 2005, p. 6
- Wind Watch: Summary of regional and national news on wind energy development 25 November 2005, p. 6, 8-9
- H R D advertisement 25 November 2005, p. 14. [93 kB]
- Putting the spin on wind Special interests push green energy agenda 18 November 2005, p. 1, 6-7.
- Getting into the mix the players in the state-wide wind debate 18 November 2005, p. 7
- Want to comment on HNWD project? Dont send those letters just yet . . . 18 November 2005, p.7
- Highlanders for Responsible Development erected 75 small signs . . . 18 November 2005, p.16
- Time is money, developer says HNWD seeks expedited approval from SCC 11 November 2005, p. 1, 5
- HNWDs application: The full text 11 November 2005, p. 4, 18-19. We have the full text of this application available as submitted to the SCC, not from The Recorder itself. [136 kB]
- Virginia SCC: The decision-makers 11 November 2005, p. 5 Theodore Morrison Jr. (Chairman), Mark C. Christie, and Clinton Miller. Miller will retire in January 2006.
- Jack Mtn. wind plan to be filed in W.Va. 11 November 2005, p. 5 This refers to the Liberty Gap project in Pendleton County.
- Wind project lawsuits to be heard Dec. 12 28 October 2005, p.3
- HRD seeks financial support for wind suits 28 October 2005, p. 7
- Wind Watch: Summary of regional and national news on wind energy development 28 October 2005, p. 12-13
- Wind Watch: Summary of regional and national news on wind energy development 21 October 2005, p. 8
- USF&WS says wind project needs study 7 October 2005, p. 6-7. Includes a sidebar on federal wildlife protection laws.
- Retired judge appointed to hear wind cases 7 October 2005, p. 6-7. Judge Paul Sheridan to replace Thomas Wood on these cases.
- Wind energy assessments found lacking 30 September 2005, p. 4-5. Summary of a recent GAO report on wind power.
- Fish & Wildlife urges caution with wind development 30 September 2005, p. 5-6
- Wind Watch: Summary of regional and national news on wind energy development 30 September 2005, p. 6
- Judge seeks replacement to hear wind energy case 23 September 2005, p. 7
- Wind application faces thorough review 16 September 2005, p. 3, 6-7
- Application review: Whos who? 16 September 2005, p. 7 A list of those who attended the HNWD preliminary review meeting.
- Wind Watch: Summary of regional and national news on wind energy development 16 September 2005, p. 9
- County seeks to dismiss wind project lawsuits 9 September 2005, p. 4
- HNWD to meet with state agencies 9 September 2005, p. 4-5
- Wind utility lawsuits move ahead, slowly 2 September 2005, p. 9
- Wind Watch: Summary of regional and national news on wind energy development 26 August 2005, p. 29.
- Wind permit generates 3rd lawsuit 12 August 2005, p.1, 4.
- Wind project proposed for national forest land (in Vermont) 12 August 2005, p. 3.
- Wind Watch: Summary of regional and national news on wind energy development 12 August 2005, p. 4.
- Highland man appointed to wind study committee 12 August 2005, p. 5.
- Wind permit approved Third lawsuit looms; opponents vow to fight on 22 July 2005, p. 1, 3-4.
- Vote sparks bitterness from many, applause from some 22 July 2005, p. 3, 5.
- Boards vote no surprise 22 July 2005, p. 5-6.
- Sullenberger explains his no position 22 July 2005, p. 7-8.
- The Board of Supervisors had their attorney prepare two resolutions (one to approve and another to deny the wind permit) to avoid the appearance that approval was preordained. Following is the text of both resolutions. The resolution of approval, which was adopted, lists the conditions imposed on the developer.
Resolution of denial 22 July 2005, p. 8.
Resolution of approval 22 July 2005, p. 8-9.
- As the playing field grows, so do the number of players 22 July 2005, p. 9, listing the agencies and attorneys now involved.
- Highlanders to sue if wind permit issued 8 July 2005, p. 1, 3
- Wind site neighbors serve notice to board 8 July 2005, p. 3-4.
- Highlanders see a future linked to natural heritage Comprehensive plan process kicks into high gear 1 July 2005, p. 3-4.
- Congress takes up debate on wind energy 24 June 2005, p. 3, 6.
- Wind vote moved back to mid-July 10 June 2005, p. 1, 6.
- County responds to height lawsuit 10 June 2005, p. 6.
- WV wind group joins others to oppose utilities 3 June 2005, p. 23, 25.
- A transcript: Hearing on wind energy proposal a nearly verbatim transcript of over seven hours of testimony 3 June 2005, p. 53-72. [208 kB 20 pages of fine print. Use the zoom feature of your Acrobat Reader to magnify it so it is readable.]
- Highlanders gather to define their community Report on the HNWD public hearing 27 May 2005, p. 1, 3-4.
- We heard from Highland New Wind Development suggesting the county could only benefit 27 May 2005, p. 5.
- We heard from wind energy project supporters and from those who feel uncertain 27 May 2005, p. 6-7.
- We heard from Allegheny Mountain neighbors 27 May 2005, p. 7.
- We heard from opponents all over Highland and more of those opposed to the utility 27 May 2005, p. 8-9.
- Zoning change sparks suit against county Motion filed to declare new height ordinance illegal 20 May 2005, p. 1, 4.
- New legislation could affect pending wind energy projects 20 May 2005, p. 4.
- Friends of Pendleton host wind meeting 20 May 2005, p. 5.
- Sen. Warner co-introduces legislation opposed to wind The complete text of Sen. Lamar Alexanders remarks to Congress on 13 May when he introduced wind utility legislation. 20 May 2005, p. 24-25.
- Wind energy hearing to draw crowd 13 May 2005, p. 9.
- At stake: Highlands future An overview of the HNWD project 13 May 2005, p. 10.
- Differing points of view The pros and cons 13 May 2005, p. 11.
- 2002-2005: How did we get here? Time line of the project 13 May 2005, p. 11.
- Three years of talk on wind, Three years of anxiety Quotes from those involved in the controversy 13 May 2005, p. 12-13.
- List of petition signers opposed to HNWD project 13 May 2005, p. 14-16.
- Those in favor of wind development in Highland 13 May 2005, p. 16.
- Highland County Needs You! full-page ad by Highlanders for Responsible Development 13 May 2005, p. 20.
- Public hearing scheduled on Highland New Wind Development application 6 May 2005, p. 1-2.
- Industrial chairman draws fire, Sparks resignations 29 April 2005, p. 1, 4.
- Supes discount planners advice 29 April 2005, p. 5-6.
- Pendleton landowners urged to negotiate 29 April 2005, p. 6-7.
- Industrial wind energy development in Virginia Environmentalists say more study needed 29 April 2005, p. 7.
- Hearing set on new height language for ordinance, Thursday, April 21, at the courthouse 15 April 2005, p. 3.
- IDA 7-0 vote encouraging for wind opponents 1 April 2005, p. 1, 4-5.
- Power co. addresses Pendleton residents wind energy questions 25 March 2005, p. 3
- Wind opponents spread their word during maple festival 18 March 2005, p. 4.
- IDA shies away from taking wind position 11 March 2005, p. 3-5.
- County officials clarify financials 4 March 2005, p. 1, 6 in response to last weeks articles.
- Administrator offers to set budget straight 4 March 2005, p. 6-7. The complete report appears on p. 22 and is also available on line.
- Action on height language delayed 4 March 2005, p. 7-8. Wording of the proposed zoning amendment is still in flux.
- Ban of industrial wind turbines pitched to Highland County officials 4 March 2005, p. 9. Highlanders proposal is presented to the Planning Commission.
- Last years tax increase creates county surplus 25 February 2005, p. 1, 5, 7 Highland County is not in dire financial straits.
- CPA sees growth; supervisor not so sure 25 February 2005, p. 6-7 Steve Fullerton and Jerry Rexrode discuss county finances.
- Highlanders call for ban on big wind 25 February 2005, p. 10 Zoning amendments on wind turbines and structure height requested.
- IDA joins wind talks Chairman takes position project good for county 18 February 2005, p. 1, 4 Report on the first IDA meeting to address the wind issue.
- Wind impacts: From to taxes to power lines 18 February 2005, p. 4-6 Specific concerns to be addressed by the IDA.
- County attorney says height proposal has no teeth 18 February 2005, p. 6-7 The latest BOS proposal on height regulations remains inadequate.
- Hangers wind study bill stalls County takes up height again 11 February 2005, p. 2 A brief article listing the weeks events.
- Hangers help irks supervisors 4 February 2005, p. 1, 6 Highland supervisors do not like the wind-utility tax bill.
- Will Virginia study wind development? 4 February 2005, p. 7 The proposal for a legislative subcommittee to study wind energy is being diverted to the Division of Mines, Minerals and Energy, a move that would surely bias the study in favor of wind development.
- Height changes withdrawn 4 February 2005, p. 7 Another zig in the road to a zoning amendment on structure height.
- Its a question of money 4 February 2005, p. 8 Potential tax revenue tops the list of reasons to consider wind development
- Majority rules? 4 February 2005, p. 8 About 1200 have signed petitions opposing wind turbines but Jerry Rexrodes list shows about 150 in favor and 44 opposed.
- Tucker gets $46,000 turbine tax payment 4 February 2005, p. 8 The first tax revenue received, this covers six months for the 44-turbine facility.
- Wind debate hangs on property rights, Blagg says 28 January 2005, p. 5,12-13
- Hanger introduces another wind bill 28 January 2005, sidebar, p. 5
- Whats the IDA? 28 January 2005, sidebar, p. 13
- Hanger introduces first wind energy legislation 21 January 2005, p. 1-2
- Wind vote delayed 14 January 2005, p. 1-2 Supervisors will give the zoning issue further study.
- Highlanders for Responsible Development plans 2nd meeting 14 January 2005, p. 2
- Pendleton wind project opponents share information, 14 January 2005, p. 8 Report on the 10 January meeting of FOBPC.
- Down to the wire Key wind development vote set for Monday 7 January 2005, p.1,3 [127 kB] preparing to vote on the zoning amendment.
- Legislators cautious about wind development Should wind energy be part of our mix? I really dont know. (Del. Chris Saxman) 7 January 2005, p. 2
- Citizens group forms to protect, enhance county 7 January 2005, p. 3 Highlanders for Responsible Development.
- Decision, hearing dates scheduled for wind project 7 January 2005, sidebar, p. 4
- U. S. Wind Force withdraws project application, for now Developer expects to re-apply for Pendleton utility 7 January 2005, p. 5
- Archive of 2004 Articles
Editorials:
- Editorials published on or after 3 January 2008
- Editorials published in 2007
- Editorials published in 2006
- At last, a shift in the wind 16 December 2005, p. 21.
- Dealing with the consequences of folly 18 November 2005, p. 21
- SCC needs to hear our voices 11 November 2005, p. 21
- Wind is shifting 30 September 2005, p. 18, 20.
- State agencies get weight on their shoulders 16 September 2005, p. 21.
- An elephant in the room 12 August 2005, p. 21.
- Sold out, but not for sale 22 July 2005, p. 21.
- An ill wind blows in Highland 8 July 2005, p. 21.
- Stakes rise ever higher 27 May 2005, p. 21.
- A last chance to get it right 13 May 2005, p. 29.
- Against all good reason Supervisors change the zoning ordinance 29 April 2005, p. 21, 24.
- Excluding public a poor choice for collaborative 29 April 2005, p. 21
- Cart is still before the horse 15 April 2005, p. 21, 24.
- 7 Highlanders make a difference 1 April 2005, p. 21, praising the IDA vote to stand behind existing regulations.
- Friction is part of the process Strongly worded debate is a good thing 25 March 2005, p. 21, including a cartoon by Judy Skeen.
- Leadership requires taking stand 11 March 2005, p. 21-22.
- Windmills considered on false premise 25 February 2005, p. 19-20 Increased tax revenue is not a reason to permit wind turbines.
- Wind power proponents find a voice 18 February 2005, p.21-22
- David Smith accuses The Recorder of using trick photography 18 February 2005, p.21
- Windmills spinning out of control 4 February 2005, p. 19,21.
- Windmills: Understand the trade-off, 21 January 2005, p. 19. Reprint of an editorial from The Baltimore Sun, 10 January 2005.
- Board trying to get it right 14 January 2005, p.25
- Act of courage would be gratefully received 7 January 2005, p.25, 29 [260 kB, including map of regional wind plants] dont amend the zoning ordinance as proposed.
- Archive of 2004 Editorials
Letters:
- Letters published on or after 3 January 2008
- Letters published in 2007
- Letters published in 2006
- Wind battle to be fought with words Larry C. and Susan Shea Held, Monterey 18 November 2005, p. 22
- Board to blame for legal expenses Richard Holman, Monterey 11 November 2005, p. 22
- Get opinions on wind to officials John Vinson, Monterey 28 October 2005, p. 22
- Protect our national symbol Orren L. Royal, Dublin, VA 28 October 2005, p. 22 (in reference to eagle letter, below)
- Eagle sighting was bittersweet Dale R. Nesselrodt, Chesterfield, VA 21 October 2005, p. 22
- Turbine site is not unravaged land Mitch King, Charlottesville 21 October 2005, p. 22
- Staying focused on protecting the county Lucile Miller, Blue Grass 14 October 2005, p. 17
- Highland is not your back yard M. C. Veasey, Monterey 7 October 2005, p. 17
- Moderator tells his side of the story Michel A. Mitch King, Charlottesville, VA 30 September 2005, p. 19
- Look at whole energy picture Alden Hathaway, Washington, DC 30 September 2005, p. 19-20
- Guest View: Wind industry a powerful foe in energy debate Lucile S. Miller 23 September 2005, p. 22
- As I See It: Wind power all about attitude, and answers Betty Morse 23 September 2005, p. 23
-
Supervisors set example for us Bill Cox, Monterey 9 September 2005, p. 22
- Supervisors minds were made up already Jimmy Carter, Gastonia, NC 26 August 2005, p. 22.
- Highland visitor opposes utility Ron Messina, Montpelier, VA 19 August 2005, p. 22, 24.
- Guest View: Renewable yes, but dont call it green energy Tom Brody, Hightown 19 August 2005, p. 24. This column was reprinted from The Richmond Times-Dispatch, 14 August 2005.
- Guest View: Virginia should embrace wind energy projects Jonathan Miles, Harrisonburg 19 August 2005, p. 25. This column was reprinted from The Richmond Times-Dispatch, 14 August 2005.
- Keep the fight fair and clean Bill and Karin Banks, Mustoe 12 August 2005, p. 22
- Democracy short-circuited Barbara B. and Timothy Downs, Monterey 12 August 2005, p. 22
- Many questions, so few answers John Vinson, Monterey 12 August 2005, p. 22
- Conversations: After all is said and done, we rely on ourselves by Jim Jacenich, 12 August 2005, p. 23
- Motives are questionable Charlie Davenport, Monterey 5 August 2005, p. 22
- Citizens must participate now Art Applegate, Bolar 5 August 2005, p. 22
- Guest View: Constitutional rights should not be forgotten Deborah Huso 5 August 2005, p. 23.
(Column about the Supreme Courts eminent domain ruling.)
- Rexrode, Blagg voted right way Danielle Carter, Hightown 29 July 2005, p.20
- Visitor praying for Highland Angela D. Stallings, Reidsville, NC 29 July 2005, p. 20
- How about a nuclear plant? Greg Carter, Hightown 29 July 2005, p. 20-21
- Pendleton now at further risk Arthur Hooton, Riverton, WV 29 July 2005, p. 21-22
- Continue to fight for county Linda Cooper, Star City, WV 29 July 2005, p. 22
- A tribute to home county Sarah E. Skeen, Highland County resident 29 July 2005, p. 22
- Five letters were published on 22 July 2005 under the headline, Wind permit approval sparks strong emotions:
1. Near-sighted officials focued on the dollar Art Applegate, Bolar, p. 22
2. Supervisors based vote on whats best Nancy H. Waybright, Roanoke, VA, p. 22
3. The real fight is just beginning Larry Held, Monterey, p. 22
4. Something must be rotten in Monterey Orren L. Royal, Dublin, VA, p. 22-23
5. Remember this at the next ballot box Ron Squire Steffey, Williamsburg, VA, p. 23
- Guest View: First do no harm forgotten by Highland board Mike and Lucia Hughes, Hightown and Alexandria, VA 22 July 2005, p. 24
- Too many unanswered questions on wind Porter Caldwell, Fincastle and Head Waters, VA 22 July 2005, p. 25
- Eminent domain threat very real Joan Phelps, Hot Springs 22 July 2005, p. 25. While not directly about the wind issue, this letter points to the recent Supreme Court decision that allows private industry to condemn land for non-public uses, which could include the wind industry.
- Wind farm bad idea for county Thomas Shrader, Henderson, NV 15 July 2005, p. 20
- Wind project moves on profit Corbin Dixon, Staunton 15 July 2005, p. 20
- Vote with majority against wind turbines Larry Held, Monterey 8 July 2005, p. 24
- Wind farms enjoyed by new Virginia resident Scott Martin, Mechanicsville, VA 24 June 2005, p. 22
- Wind project argument does not hold water Larry Thomas, Circleville, WV 24 June 2005, p. 23-24
- Guest View: Wind energy argument misleading Glenn Schleede, Energy policy consultant, Round Hill, VA 24 June 2005, p. 25
- Visitor holds tight to idea that not everything can be bought Sandra Spradin, Vinton, VA 17 June 2005, p. 22
- Its all about the money Rick Webb, Mustoe 17 June 2005, p. 23
- Require wind developer to put up bond Walter Pitsenberger, Moyers, WV 10 June 2005, p. 22
- Guest View: Wind debate stirs innkeepers thoughts Gregg Morse, Owner, The Highland Inn, Monterey 10 June 2005, p. 23-24
- Life in Egypt: Wind power a threat to sense of belonging Jessica Rogers, Recorder columnist, Valley Center 3 June 2005, p. 23
- County without changes is unbalanced Trent Burkholder, Blue Grass 27 May 2005, p. 22
- Yes ... Lets be just like Switzerland Larry Held, Monterey 27 May 2005, p. 22
- Wind offers illusory gain Elizabeth Lawson, Ithaca, NY 27 May 2005, p. 23
- We are all a part of the big picture Kevin McCune, Millboro 27 May 2005, p. 24
- Breaks readers heart to think of turbines Ann Wimer Golloday, Waynesboro 27 May 2005, p. 24
- Mr. McBride, can we evaluate your projects business plan? Andrew Luther, Hightown 27 May 2005, p. 24
- If trust is the issue, trust the people Rich Holman, Monterey 27 May 2005, p. 24-25
- A yes vote opens Pandoras box French C. Grimes, Blue Grass valley landowner 13 May 2005, p. 30
- Another way to look at it Highland County Board of Supervisors 13 May 2005, p. 30
- Guest View: Cherish and protect our rural landscape Deborah Huso, reprinted from the May 2005 issue of Cooperative Living 13 May 2005, p. 31
- Landowners rights stop where neighbors rights start Ben Blakemore, Little Valley, VA 13 May 2005, p. 32-33
- Highland deserves explanation Kirk Billingsley, Monterey 6 May 2005, p. 22
- Guest View: Highlanders need attitude adjustment Todd Boober Frye, Monterey 6 May 2005, p. 23-24
- Supervisors are willing to sell out the county Cable Risdon, Doe Hill 6 May 2005, p. 24
- Windmills a big gamble Mac Hill, Monterey 8 April 2005, p. 22
- Dont let Gods country be ruined by windmills Karyn Doane, Head Waters 1 April 2005, p. 22
- Time for silent majority to be heard Stephen D. Halterman, Millboro 1 April 2005, p. 23, 26
- Lets define eyesore Roscoe Moyers, Bartow, WV 25 March 2005, p. 22
- Respect each others rights to opinions Diane Klein, Head Waters 25 March 2005, P. 22
- Tacky vs. monstrous Charlie Davenport, Vanderpool 25 March 2005, p. 23
- Truly amazing Rich Holman, Monterey 25 March 2005, p. 23 that some are offended by four-foot temporary signs but not by 400-foot permanent turbines.
- Maple Festival not the place for windmill signs Tina Waybright, Monterey 18 March 2005, p. 23
- Take down no wind signs Dorothy Stephenson, Monterey 18 March 2005, p. 23-24
- Global warming doesnt justify industrial wind energy facilities John R. Sweet, Mustoe 18 March 2005, p. 24
- Tired of officials insulting the public Kathy Patterson, Monterey 18 March 2005, p. 24
- Windmills not the energy solution Paul Klein, Head Waters 18 March 2005, p. 24
- Good board; support it Brenda Pullin, Monterey 11 March 2005, p. 22
- Nuclear is energy future M. C. Veasey 11 March 2005, p. 22
- Global warming endangers Highlands maple industry Alden Hathaway, Washington, D.C. 11 March 2005, p. 23
- Lighten up on this windmill stuff Keith Shaner, McDowell 4 March 2005, p. 20
- Officials missing big picture Vote no on wind turbines Hamil D. Skip Jones Jr., Richmond 4 March 2005, p. 20
- Recorder editorial irks supervisor Robin Sullenberger, Monterey 4 March 2005, p. 21
- Revenue will come for right reasons; say no to turbines Hilton Lester, Stuarts Draft 18 February 2005, p. 22
- Highlanders for Responsible Development share Kansas congressmans wind concerns 18 February 2005, p. 23 Rep. Frank Millers 20 January 2005 press release, submitted by Ske Ellington on behalf of HRD.
- A center for healing Suzanne Brintzenhofe, Monterey 4 February 2005, p. 20 suggests an alternative industry to wind power.
- In the interest of unity, County-wide vote needed Peggy Sawyers, McDowell 4 February 2005, p. 20
- Supervisors, listen to what were telling you What part of community dont you understand? Judy Skeen, Monterey 28 January 2005, p. 21
- Another no to wind project Wayne Stokes Goodall, Pittsboro, NC 21 January 2005, p. 20
- Eagles return offers a sign Orren L. Royal, Dublin, VA 21 January 2005, p. 20
- Please, supervisors, vote against wind Diane Shumate Crawford, Bedford, VA 21 January 2005, p. 20
- Take the high road for Highland County Cindy Beverage, Nashville, TN 14 January 2005, p. 26
- Criticism from wind group surprises target Rick Webb, Monterey 14 January 2005, p. 26
- Work together; say no to wind project Jim and Judith A. Key, Blue Grass 14 January 2005, p. 27
- Civility, trust, and cooperation needed McChesney Goodall III, Highland County
- Fight like hell for whats yours Robert D. Foley, Lunenburg, VA 7 January 2005, p. 26
- Wind turbines not right for Highland County Paul Klein, Head Waters 7 January 2005, p. 26
- Why there should not be wind turbines in Highland Alex Dymersky, Blue Grass 7 January 2005, p. 27
- Wind collaborative responds to article Geraldine Nicholson, Exec. Dir., VWEC 7 January 2005, p. 28
- Archive of 2004 Letters
John R. Sweet, Mustoe, VA
Part of the Backbone Mountain project in Tucker County, WV. These are reported to be 345 feet high while those proposed for Highland are expected to be 400 feet high. Photo by Sandy Hevener
Return to the top of this page or go back to the main wind page.